Bibliographie générale

 

  • Ajzen I. 2001. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:27–58
  • Allport GW. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge
  • Bail C. 2008. The configuration of symbolic boundaries against immigrants in Europe. Am. Sociol. Rev. 73:37–59
  • Bauer TK, Lofstrom M, Zimmermann KF. 2001. Immigration policy, assimilation of immigrants, and natives’ sentiments towards immigrants: evidence from 12 OECD countries. CCIS Work. Pap. 33, Cent. Comp.Immigr. Stud., Univ. Calif., San Diego. http://www.ccis-ucsd.org/PUBLICATIONS/wrkg33.pdf
  • Berg JA. 2009. White public opinion toward undocumented immigrants: threat and interpersonal environment. Sociol. Perspect. 52(1):39–58
  • Bloemraad I, Korteweg A, Yurdakul G. 2008. Citizenship and immigration: multiculturalism, assimilation, and challenges to the nation-state. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 34:153–79
  • Blumer H. 1958. Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pac. Sociol. Rev. 1:3–7
  • Bobo L. 1988. Group conflict, prejudice, and the paradox of contemporary racial attitudes. In Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy, ed. PA Katz, PD Taylor, pp. 85–114. New York: Plenum
  • Bobo L. 1999. Prejudice as group position: microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. J. Soc. Issues 55:445–72
  • Bobo L. 2000. Race and beliefs about affirmative action: assessing the effects of interests, group threat, ideology, and racism. See Sears et al. 2000, pp. 137–64
  • Brewer MB. 1996. When contact is not enough: social identity and intergroup cooperation. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 20(3–4):291–303
  • Burns P, Gimpel JG. 2000. Economic insecurity, prejudicial stereotypes, and public opinion on immigration policy. Polit. Sci. Q. 115(2):201–25
  • Card D, Dustmann C, Preston I. 2005. Understanding attitudes to immigration: the migration and minority module of the first European Social Survey. CReAM Discuss. Pap 03/05, Cent. Res. Anal. Migr., Econ. Dept., Univ. College, London. http://www.econ.ucl.ac.uk/cream/pages/CDP/CDP_03_05.pdf
  • Ceobanu AM, Escandell X. 2008. East is West? National feelings and anti-immigrant sentiment in Europe. Soc. Sci. Res. 37:1147–70
  • Chandler CR, Tsai Y. 2001. Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: an analysis of data from the General Social Survey. Soc. Sci. J. 38:177–88
  • Citrin J, Sides J. 2008. Immigration and the imagined community in Europe and the United States. Polit. Stud. 56:33–56
  • Coenders M, Lubbers M, Scheepers P. 2005. Majorities’ attitudes towards minorities in European Union member states: results from the Standard Eurobarometer 1997–2000–2003. In Majority Populations’ Attitudes towards Migrants andMinorities, ed.M Coenders,M Lubbers, P Scheepers, pp. 279–320. Vienna: Eur. Monit. Cent. Racism Xenophob.
  • Coenders M, Lubbers M, Scheepers P. 2008. Support for repatriation policies of migrants: comparisons across and explanations for European countries. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 49(2–3):175–94
  • Coenders M, Lubbers M, Scheepers P. 2009. Opposition to civil rights for legal migrants in Central and Eastern Europe. E. Eur. Polit. Soc. 23(2):146–64
  • Coenders M, Scheepers P. 1998. Support for ethnic discrimination in the Netherlands 1979–1993: effect of period, cohort and individual characteristics. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 14(2):405–22
  • Coenders M, Scheepers P. 2003. The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: an international comparison. Polit. Psychol. 24(2):313–43
  • Coenders M, Scheepers P. 2004. Associations between nationalist attitudes and exclusionist reactions in 22 countries. See Gijsberts et al. 2004a, pp. 187–208
  • Cornelius WA, Rosenblum MR. 2005. Immigration and politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 8:99–119
  • Coser L. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press
  • Davidov E, Meuleman B, Billiet J, Schmidt P. 2008. Values and support for immigration: a cross-country comparison. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 24(5):583–99
  • De Figueredo RJP Jr, Elkins Z. 2003. Are patriots bigots? An inquiry into the vices of in-group pride. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 47:171–88
  • Escandell X, Ceobanu AM. 2009. When contact with immigrants matters: threat, interethnic attitudes and foreigner exclusionism in Spain’s Comunidades Autonomas. Ethn. Racial Stud. 32(1):44–69
  • Espenshade TJ, Hempstead K. 1996. Contemporary American attitudes toward U.S. immigration. Int. Migr. Rev. 30(2):535–70
  • Esses VM, Dovidio JF, Hodson G. 2002. Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States and Canada in response to the September 11, 2001 “Attack on America.” Anal. Soc. Issues Public Policy 2:69–85
  • Esses VM, Dovidio JF, Jackson LM, Armstrong TL. 2001. The immigration dilemma: the role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. J. Soc. Issues 57(3):389–412
  • Esses VM, Jackson LM, Armstrong TL. 1998. Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: an instrumental model of group conflict. J. Soc. Issues 54(4):699–724
  • Evans G, Need A. 2002. Explaining ethnic polarization over attitudes towards minority rights in Eastern Europe: a multilevel analysis. Soc. Sci. Res. 31:653–80
  • Facchini G, Mayda AM. 2008. From individual attitudes towards migrants to migration policy outcomes: theory and evidence. Econ. Policy 23(56):651–713
  • Facchini G,Mayda AM. 2009. Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes toward immigrants? Evidence across countries. Rev. Econ. Stat. 91(2):295–314
  • Fetzer J. 2000. Economic self-interest or cultural marginality? Anti-immigration sentiment and nativist political movements in France, Germany and the USA. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 26(1):5–23
  • Fetzer J. 2000. Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in the United States, France and Germany. New York/Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  • Gang IN, Rivera-Batiz FL, Yun MS. 2002. Economic strain, ethnic concentration and attitudes towards foreigners in the European Union. IZA Discuss. Pap. 578, IZA, Bonn. http://ftp.iza.org/dp578.pdf
  • Gijsberts M, Hagendoorn L, Scheepers P, eds. 2004a. Nationalism and Exclusion of Migrants. Cross-National Comparisons. Aldershot, UK/Burlington, VT: Ashgate
  • Golder M. 2003. Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in Western Europe. Comp. Polit. Stud. 36(4):432–66
  • Gorodzeisky A, Semyonov M. 2009. Terms of exclusion: public views towards admission and allocation of rights to immigrants in European countries. Ethn. Racial Stud. 32(1):401–23
  • Green EGT. 2009. Who can enter? A multilevel analysis on public support for immigration criteria across 20 European countries. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 12(1):41–60
  • Hainmueller J, Hiscox MJ. 2007. Educated preferences: explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. Int. Organ. 61:399–442
  • Hello E, Scheepers P, Gijsberts M. 2002. Education and ethnic prejudice in Europe: explanations for crossnational variances in the educational effect on ethnic prejudice. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 46(1):5–24
  • Hjerm M. 1998. National identities, national pride and xenophobia: a comparison of four Western countries. Acta Sociol. 41:335–47
  • Hjerm M. 2001. Education, xenophobia and nationalism: a comparative analysis. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 27(1):37– 60
  • Hjerm M. 2007. Do numbers really count? Group threat theory revisited. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 33(8):1253–75
  • Hollifield JF. 2000. The politics of international migration: How can we bring the state back in? In Migration Theory: TalkingAcrossDisciplines, ed.CBBrettell, JF Hollifield, pp. 137–86.NewYork/London:Routledge
  • Hopkins D. 2010. Politicized places: explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. In press
  • Hox JJ. 1997. From theoretical concept to survey question. In Survey Measurement and Process Quality, ed.
  • Lyberg L, Biemer P, Collins M, De Leeuw E, Dippo C, Schwartz N, Trewin D, pp. 47–70. New York: Wiley
  • Jackman MR, Muha MJ. 1984. Education and intergroup attitudes: moral enlightenment, superficial democratic commitment, or ideological refinement? Am. Sociol. Rev. 49:751–69
  • Jackson JS, Brown KT, Brown TN, Marks B. 2001. Contemporary immigration policy orientations among dominant-group members in Western Europe. J. Soc. Issues 57(3):431–56
  • Jones FL, Smith P. 2001. Diversity and commonality in national identities: an exploratory analysis of crossnational patterns. J. Sociol. 37(1):45–63
  • Jones FL, Smith P. 2001. Individual and societal bases of national identity: a comparative multi-level analysis. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 17(2):103–18
  • Kivisto P. 2001. Theorizing transnational immigration: a critical review of current efforts. Ethn. Racial Stud. 24(4):549–77
  • Knudsen K. 1997. Scandinavian neighbourswith different character?Attitudes toward immigrants and national identity in Norway and Sweden. Acta Sociol. 40:223–43
  • Kunovich RM. 2002. Social structural sources of anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe. Int. J. Sociol. 32(1):39–57
  • Kunovich RM. 2004. Social structural position and prejudice: an exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes. Soc. Sci. Res. 33:20–44
  • Kunovich RM. 2009. The sources and consequences of national identification. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:573–93
  • Lahav G. 2004. Public opinion toward immigration in the European Union: Does it matter? Comp. Polit. Stud. 37(10):1151–83
  • LeVine RA, Campbell DT. 1972. Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes, and Group Behavior. New York: Wiley 326
  • Lubbers M, GijsbertsM, Scheepers P. 2002. Extreme right-wing voting in Western Europe. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 41:345–78
  • Luedtke A. 2005. European integration, public opinion and immigration policies. Eur. Union Polit. 6(1):83–112
  • Maddens B, Billiet K, Beerten R. 2000. National identity and the attitude towards foreigners in multi-national states: the case of Belgium. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 26(1):45–60
  • Malchow-Møller N, Munch JR, Schroll S, Skaksen JR. 2008. Attitudes towards immigration—perceived consequences and economic self-interest. Econ. Lett. 100:254–57
  • Malchow-MøllerN,Munch JR, Schroll S, Skaksen JR. 2009. Explaining cross-country differences in attitudes towards immigration in the EU-15. Soc. Indic. Res. 91:371–90
  • Mayda AM. 2006. Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. Rev. Econ. Stat. 88(3):510–30
  • McLaren LM. 2003. Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Soc. Forces 81(3):909–36
  • Messina MA. 2007. The Logics and Politics of Post-WWII Migration to Western Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  • Meuleman B, Davidov E, Billiet J. 2009. Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: a dynamic group conflict theory approach. Soc. Sci. Res. 38:352–65
  • Morawska E. 2008. Research on immigration/ethnicity in Europe and the United States: a comparison. Sociol. Q. 49:465–82
  • Mummendey A, Klink A, Brown R. 2001. Nationalism and patriotism: national identification and out-group rejection. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 40:159–72
  • O’Connell M. 2005. Economic forces and anti-immigrant attitudes in Western Europe: a paradox in search of an explanation. Patterns Prejudice 39(1):60–74
  • OECD (Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.). 2008. InternationalMigration Outlook: SOPEMI 2009. Special Focus:Managing Labor Migration Beyond the Crisis. Paris: OECD Publ. http://www.oecd.org/els/migration/imo
  • Olzak S. 1992. The Dynamic of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  • O’Rourke KH, Sinnott R. 2006. The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 22:838–61
  • O’Shea R, Bryson C, Jowell R. 2002. Comparative Attitudinal Research in Europe. London: ESS Directorate, Natl. Cent. Soc. Res. London
  • Quillian L. 1995. Prejudice as a response to perceived threat: population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60(4):586–611
  • Quillian L. 2006. New approaches to understanding racial prejudice and discrimination. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:299–328
  • Palmer D. 1996. Determinants of Canadian attitudes towards immigration: more than just racism? Can. J. Behav. Sci. 28:180–92
  • Pettigrew TF. 1998a. Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49:65–85
  • Pettigrew TF. 1998b. Reactions toward the new minorities of Western Europe. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24:77–103
  • Pettigrew TF. 2000. Systematizing the predictors of prejudice. See Sears  et al. 2000, pp. 280–301
  • Raijman R, Davidov E, Schmidt P, Hochman O. 2008. What does a nation owe noncitizens? National attachments, perception of threat and attitudes towards granting citizenship rights in a comparative perspective. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 49(2–3):195–220
  • Rydgren J. 2007. The sociology of the radical right. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:241–62
  • Saris WE, Gallhofer I. 2004. Operationalization of social science concepts by intuition. Qual. Quant. 38:235– 58
  • Scheepers P, Gijsberts M, Coenders M. 2002a. Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived group threat. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 18(1):17–34
  • Scheepers P, Gijsberts M, Hello E. 2002b. Religiosity and prejudice against ethnic minorities in Europe: cross-national tests on a controversial relationship. Rev. Relig. Res. 43(3):242–65
  • Scheve KF, Slaughter MJ. 2001. Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Rev. Econ. Stat. 83(1):133–45
  • Schlueter E,Wagner U. 2008. Regional differences matter. Examining the dual influence of the regional size of the immigrant population on derogation of immigrants in Europe. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 49(2–3):153–73
  • Schneider SL. 2008. Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 24(1):53–67
  • Schuman H. 2000. The perils of correlation, the lure of labels, and the beauty of negative results. See Sears et al. 2000, pp. 302–23
  • Sears DO, Sidanius J, Bobo L, eds. 2000. Racialized Politics: The Debate about Racism in America. Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
  • Semyonov M, Glikman A. 2009. Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and antiminority attitudes in European societies. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 25(6):693–708
  • Semyonov M, Raijman R, Gorodzeisky A. 2008. Foreigners’ impact on European societies. Public views and perceptions in a cross-national comparative perspective. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 49(1):5–29
  • Sides J, Citrin J. 2007. European opinion about immigration: the role of identities, interests, and information. Brit. J. Polit. Sci. 37:477–504
  • Simon RJ, Lynch JP. 1999. A comparative assessment of public opinion toward immigrants and immigration policies. Int. Migr. Rev. 33(2):466–67
  • Simon RJ, Sikich KW. 2007. Public attitudes towards immigrants and immigration policies across seven nations. Int. Migr. Rev. 41(4):956–62
  • Strabac Z, Listhaug O. 2008. Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: a multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries. Soc. Sci. Res. 37:268–86
  • Tajfel H. 1982. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC. 1986. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. S Worchel,WAustin, pp. 2–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall
  • UN Popul. Div. 2009. International Migration Report 2006: A Global Assessment. New York: UN Publ.
  • Voci A, Hewstone M. 2003 ‘‘Intergroup Contact and Prejudice toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Group Salience.’’ Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6:37–54.
  • Wagner U, Zick A. 1995. The relationship of formal education to ethnic prejudice: its reliability, validity and explanation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 25:41–56
  • Ward C, Masgoret AM. 2008. Attitudes towards immigrants, immigration, and multiculturalism in New Zealand: a social psychological analysis. Int. Migr. Rev. 42(1):227–48
  • Wilkes R, Guppy N, Farris L. 2007. Comment on Semyonov, Raijman, and Gorodzeisky, ASR, June 2008: right-wing parties and antiforeigner sentiment in Europe. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:831–40
  • Wilkes R, Guppy N, Farris L. 2008. ‘No thanks, we’re full’: individual characteristics, national context, and changing attitudes toward immigration. Int. Migr. Rev. 42(2):302–29
  • Weldon S. 2006. The institutional context of tolerance for ethnicminorities: a comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50(2):331–49
  • Zick A, Pettigrew TF,Wagner U. 2008. Ethnic prejudice and discrimination in Europe. J. Soc. Issues 64(2):233– 51
Coordination Tricud : CEDEM – ULG - Marco Martiniello & Sonia Gsir - 7 boulevard du Rectorat, B31, #45, 4000 Liège, Belgique
tel. : +32 4 366 31 28 – fax. : + 32 4 366 47 51 – email : Sonia.Gsir@ulg.ac.be
© C-group Communication